<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3.5 0day Vulnerability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.csamuel.org/2009/07/14/firefox-3-5-0day-vulnerability/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.csamuel.org/2009/07/14/firefox-3-5-0day-vulnerability</link>
	<description>The Thoughts and Feelings of a Melbourne Person</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 20:34:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Musings of Chris Samuel &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Firefox 3.5.1 Vulnerability</title>
		<link>http://www.csamuel.org/2009/07/14/firefox-3-5-0day-vulnerability/comment-page-1#comment-56814</link>
		<dc:creator>The Musings of Chris Samuel &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Firefox 3.5.1 Vulnerability</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 00:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csamuel.org/?p=1837#comment-56814</guid>
		<description>[...] at present to check what it says. One possible explanation is that Mozilla pushed out 3.5.1 to fix the 3.5 0day that appeared recently, but this bug was found beforehand and Mozilla weren&#8217;t aware of it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at present to check what it says. One possible explanation is that Mozilla pushed out 3.5.1 to fix the 3.5 0day that appeared recently, but this bug was found beforehand and Mozilla weren&#8217;t aware of it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Samuel</title>
		<link>http://www.csamuel.org/2009/07/14/firefox-3-5-0day-vulnerability/comment-page-1#comment-56804</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 12:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csamuel.org/?p=1837#comment-56804</guid>
		<description>Now fixed in Firefox 3.5.1!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now fixed in Firefox 3.5.1!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.csamuel.org/2009/07/14/firefox-3-5-0day-vulnerability/comment-page-1#comment-56758</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csamuel.org/?p=1837#comment-56758</guid>
		<description>They do acknowledge it now on mozilla.com, in a blog post at least: http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2009/07/14/critical-javascript-vulnerability-in-firefox-35/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They do acknowledge it now on mozilla.com, in a blog post at least: <a href="http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2009/07/14/critical-javascript-vulnerability-in-firefox-35/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2009/07/14/critical-javascript-vulnerability-in-firefox-35/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.csamuel.org/2009/07/14/firefox-3-5-0day-vulnerability/comment-page-1#comment-56754</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csamuel.org/?p=1837#comment-56754</guid>
		<description>Oh dear :(

Tomorrow will be interesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear <img src='http://www.csamuel.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Tomorrow will be interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
