Comments on: Response to Greg Black on ZFS & FUSE http://www.csamuel.org/2009/09/27/response-to-greg-black-on-zfs-fuse Computers, science, archaeology and other random burblings Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:18:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Seth http://www.csamuel.org/2009/09/27/response-to-greg-black-on-zfs-fuse/comment-page-1#comment-59552 Seth Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:02:09 +0000 http://www.csamuel.org/?p=1929#comment-59552 And there is a proper domain name now: http://zfs-fuse.net/ Track issues, releases and general info there! And there is a proper domain name now: http://zfs-fuse.net/

Track issues, releases and general info there!

]]> By: Rudd-O http://www.csamuel.org/2009/09/27/response-to-greg-black-on-zfs-fuse/comment-page-1#comment-58071 Rudd-O Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:23:10 +0000 http://www.csamuel.org/?p=1929#comment-58071 We're far ahead of BTRFS and, barring a few kinks in the caching inside FUSE, you should be able to get performance comparable to in-kernel solutions right now. Oh, and ZFS users have tons of data protection success stories. ZFS FTW. We’re far ahead of BTRFS and, barring a few kinks in the caching inside FUSE, you should be able to get performance comparable to in-kernel solutions right now. Oh, and ZFS users have tons of data protection success stories. ZFS FTW.

]]> By: Greg Black http://www.csamuel.org/2009/09/27/response-to-greg-black-on-zfs-fuse/comment-page-1#comment-58002 Greg Black Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:25:48 +0000 http://www.csamuel.org/?p=1929#comment-58002 Interesting followup. I had failed to find the newer work on fuse-zfs despite looking, so it was good to learn about that. I've had a look at it and it seems like it will be worth watching, although it doesn't seem quite ready to manage my data yet. As for the patent stuff, that's going to be an issue always, with the world full of nutters who think software patents make sense. My approach is to ignore it until I'm forced to do otherwise. Thanks for the extra information. Interesting followup. I had failed to find the newer work on fuse-zfs despite looking, so it was good to learn about that. I’ve had a look at it and it seems like it will be worth watching, although it doesn’t seem quite ready to manage my data yet. As for the patent stuff, that’s going to be an issue always, with the world full of nutters who think software patents make sense. My approach is to ignore it until I’m forced to do otherwise. Thanks for the extra information.

]]> By: Chris Smart http://www.csamuel.org/2009/09/27/response-to-greg-black-on-zfs-fuse/comment-page-1#comment-57979 Chris Smart Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:09:16 +0000 http://www.csamuel.org/?p=1929#comment-57979 Indeed, which makes me wonder just how far away BTRFS will actually be.. Indeed, which makes me wonder just how far away BTRFS will actually be..

]]> By: Chris Samuel http://www.csamuel.org/2009/09/27/response-to-greg-black-on-zfs-fuse/comment-page-1#comment-57978 Chris Samuel Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:59:39 +0000 http://www.csamuel.org/?p=1929#comment-57978 Hi Chris, Interesting stuff though that's a fairly old article and there's been a lot of work on btrfs in the meantime - including some good inroads into the ENOSPC of death problem. :-) Hi Chris,

Interesting stuff though that’s a fairly old article and there’s been a lot of work on btrfs in the meantime – including some good inroads into the ENOSPC of death problem. :-)

]]> By: Chris Smart http://www.csamuel.org/2009/09/27/response-to-greg-black-on-zfs-fuse/comment-page-1#comment-57974 Chris Smart Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:42:49 +0000 http://www.csamuel.org/?p=1929#comment-57974 Linux mag has an interesting article on BTRFS, the title is catchy: "Linux Don't Need No Stinkin' ZFS: BTRFS Intro & Benchmarks" http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7308 Sure, he wants a file system today, but I wonder how far away BTRFS truly is.. -c Linux mag has an interesting article on BTRFS, the title is catchy:
“Linux Don’t Need No Stinkin’ ZFS: BTRFS Intro & Benchmarks”

http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7308

Sure, he wants a file system today, but I wonder how far away BTRFS truly is..

-c

]]>