How Big Was North Korea’s Bomb ?
My good friend Alec wrote on hearing about the DPRK nuclear test:
One presumes that there is a small chance it’ll have been staged with conventionals;
That got me thinking - how large a bomb was it ? We know the USGS detected a mag 4.2 shock so I went hunting around to see if there was an algorithm for converting magnitudes on the Richter Scale into energy, and, hopefully, into kilotons or megatons. It turns out J.C. Lahr wrote up a method for the “Comparison of earthquake energy to nuclear explosion energy” and helpfully included a piece of Fortran code to create a table of comparisons.
A quick “apt-get install gfortran” and a bit of mucking around with the code and I had an approximate answer:
Mag. Energy Energy TNT TNT TNT Hiroshima
Joules ft-lbs tons megatons equiv. tons bombs
4.2 0.126E+12 0.929E+11 0.301E+02 0.301E-04 0.201E+04 0.134E+00
So a magnitude 4.2 earthquake is (roughly) equivalent to a 2 kiloton device, less than one fifth of the size of Hiroshima bomb. This means it’s probably unlikely to have been a conventional device.
So what North Korea tested was fairly small in these days of megaton devices but certainly nothing you’d want to be anywhere near..
October 10th, 2006 at 3:09 am
I was astounded at the BBC Radio 4 comment by the USA, shouting that North Korea had gone ahead with the test after international condemnation. Erm, that’s a familiar ter - international condemnation. Reminds me of the US invasion or Irac. Anyone?
October 12th, 2006 at 7:21 am
Woo, voices from the past. A mutual friend in the shedde pointed me here.
How long since the last solstice thing? too long, anyway. Mind, the next solstice is rather by way of being unsuitable for beach parties, except in the southern hemisphere, which is rather a logn way from me. Mind, I was toying with trying to emigrate…