CSamuel.org Anti-Spam Greylisting Activated

I’ve now installed and activated Postgrey, a Postfix policy service that implements “greylisting”.

So any email coming into csamuel.org for any email address hosted here will get a “try again later” message, the sending email server should retry it later. Spammers on the other hand usually try once and then move on because they’ve got so much email to send.

If you see any email rejected from csamuel.org, auties.org or donnawilliams.net because of this please email the user Postmaster, who won’t have this test applied

This is a pretty impressive graph from the guy who wrote Postgrey to show what happened when he activated it for him on the Tuesday.

David Schweikert's graph of email after activating Postgrey

Massachusetts Confirms OpenDoc is Go

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts has now confirmed that its final decision is that their “Enterprise Technical Reference Model” Discipline for Data Formats specifies OpenDocument format as a requirement for office documents, as they did in their final draft.

To quote:

Description – The OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) is a standardized XML-based file format specification suitable for office applications. It covers the features required by text, spreadsheets, charts, and graphical documents. The specification was recently approved by OASIS as an open standard. OASIS has also submitted the standard to ISO for consideration as an international standard for office document formats.


Guidelines
– The OpenDocument format must be used for office documents such as text documents (.odt), spreadsheets (.ods), and presentations (.odp). The OpenDocument format is currently supported by a variety of office applications including OpenOffice.org, StarOffice, KOffice, and IBM Workplace.

[…] Agencies will need to develop phased migration plans allowing them to configure existing applications to save office documents by default in the OpenDocument format with an implementation date of January 1, 2007. Any acquisition of new office applications must support the OpenDocument format natively.

They also have a FAQ page which shows that they really do “get it” and didn’t buy the claims that vendors would be “locked out” by choosing this format, debunking the myth thus:

QUESTION: Why are you making agencies deploy a single office product? Doesn’t state procurement law require competition among vendors, which you will foreclose?


ANSWER: The Final ETRM Version 3.5 does not require that agencies use only one office product. To the contrary, it offers agencies many choices. Agencies may choose to retain their existing MS Office licenses, as long as they use a method to save documents in Open Document Format. They may also use one of the many office tools that support Open Document Format in native format— OpenOffice, StarOffice, KOffice, Abiword, eZ publish, IBM Workplace, Knomos case management, Scribus DTP, TextMaker and Visioo Writer. Because the Open Document Format is an open standard, it increases the vendor pool available to state agencies by encouraging and permitting vendors not already in this field to develop products that support the standard. Adoption of the Final ETRM Version 3.5 will greatly increase competition among vendors for the sale of office applications to agencies.

They’ve also published all public comments received on this initiative, interesting reading!

SCO’s Attempt to Trademark “UNIX SYSTEMS LABORATORIES” Rejected by USPTO

So, SCO tried to trademark the mark “UNIX SYSTEMS LABORATORIES” (originated by AT&T) back in June 2004, and that has now been rejected (subject to appeal) by the USPTO. You can see all the documents on the case on the USPTO page for US serial number 78438912

The following summarises the reason for rejection, with my emphasis on the word “again”.


Registration of the proposed mark is refused again because of a likelihood of confusion with the marks in the following U.S. Registration Nos.: 1390593, 1392203, and 2241666. Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §§1207.01 et seq. […]

In this case, Applicant’s mark and the Registered marks all share an identical term, UNIX. The term “UNIX” is the dominant feature of the marks. The mere addition of a term to a registered mark does not obviate the similarity between the marks nor does it overcome a likelihood of confusion under Section 2(d). [….]

Therefore, the presence of the highly descriptive wording, “SYSTEM LABORATORIES,” in the Applicant’s mark is insufficient to overcome the likelihood of confusion. In re E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (C.C.P.A. 1973). The average purchaser of the goods or services is likely to believe that Applicant’s goods or services emanate from the same source as the goods and services under the registered “UNIX” marks. Additionally, Applicant concedes that the marks are substantially similar. Since similarity in any one of these elements is sufficient to find a likelihood of confusion, the marks are confusingly similar.


Dell Dumps Itanic

So, Dell are dropping Itanium, apparently because Intel have stopped developing the support chipsets and now leave that up to people like HP and SGI.

Best quote from the article has to be:


Dell’s decision is hardly surprising given its poor sales figures. Dell lives or dies by high volumes, but last year shipped just 1,371 Itanium servers. That’s up from just 12 the previous year, but it was enough to give Dell five per cent of the IA-64 market.

Melbourne Software Freedom Day 2005

450 CDs given out in under 1 hour!

Today was Melbournes Second Software Freedom Day with members of Linux Users Victoria wandering through the CBD of Melbourne giving away copies of The Open CD and an Ubuntu Linux Live CD. There were about 8 people giving away CD’s and I took photos (53 of them by the look of it), which I’m now in the process of uploading for the organisers and I’ll also add into the photo gallery too!

Afterwards three of us headed over to ComputerBank’s event where they demo’d open source systems to visitors and gave a good talk and raised some very good questions from someone involved in a project to set up what sounded like a Linux based educational system at an orphanage in India (though I could have gotten those details wrong).

In Scotland there has been a motion lodged in the Scottish Parliament in support of Software Freedom Day.