Quadruple Your Chance of an Accident – Use a Hands Free Phone Whilst Driving

An interesting piece of research from Perth, they did a study of people who had required hospital treatment due to a car accident and found that using hand-held mobile phone gave you almost a 5x chance of having an accident in the next 10 minutes, whilst using a hands-free system meant almost a 4x chance of an accident.

This study is bolstered by a study done in Japan which appears to have found at least one reason why trying to use a mobile phone whilst driving is so dangerous. It’s all down to the audio quality as the signal drops out as you move from cell to cell or from obstructions.

To quote from the New Scientist article on the report:


Hamada’s team measured the sound quality of mobile phone calls in parked cars and in cars travelling at 65 kilometres per hour. A comparison of the two types of voice signal revealed silent periods of about 300 milliseconds interrupting the signal roughly six times a minute. They also discovered a time lag of about 300 milliseconds for a phone in a moving car, while for 5 per cent of the time, the frequency range becomes distorted.

Then researchers then played 11 volunteers an audio recording of a story that included similar interruptions. As the volunteers struggled to hear the distorted parts of the recording, their right parietal cortex, the part of the brain that perceives sound, became more active (Transport Research Part F, DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.016).

And for all of our sakes, please don’t even consider SMS’ing whilst driving, that’s even more dangerous!

Comments fixed

Found the problem, it was just a trivial typo; the new theme had added an extra ‘s’ on the word comment in a bit of code in two places, so very easily fixed!

Of course, because of those evil comment spamming robots out there you still have to register before you can leave a comment.

New look for CSamuel.org

After a few years of the old theme (a slightly tweaked Postnuke standard) I’ve decided to change the theme of this website for a bit of a face lift and because I was geting a bit bored with the old one. It wasn’t quite "clean" enough, if you know what I mean ?

So, after some looking around & testing on myself I’ve gone for the xSanctuary theme by Dynawerx which has a nice clean, elegant feel to it and is all done in CSS. I really like what it’s done for the layout of the side blocks (the RSS feeds from other sites in particular), it feels a lot less cluttered and Donna reckons it’s a lot easier to navigate.

Now I just need to figure out where the ability to comment has gone! 🙂

The IRA says “All IRA units have been ordered to dump arms”

The BBC is reporting that the IRA has called an end to its armed campaign in Northern Ireland.

A statement says:

“All IRA units have been ordered to dump arms. All Volunteers have been instructed to assist the development of purely political and democratic programmes through exclusively peaceful means. Volunteers must not engage in any other activities whatsoever.

Hopefully this order is sincere and the IRA members will heed it!

BBC reports 4 new attacks in London – detonators only, 1 injured

The BBC has this news report saying that:

Minor explosions using detonators only have sparked the evacuation of three Tube stations and the closure of three lines, a BBC correspondent has said.
Police cordoned off large areas around Warren Street, Oval and Shepherd’s Bush Tube stations.
A route 26 bus in Hackney Road in Bethnal Green had its windows blown out by a blast. There were no injuries.

[…]


One person was injured at Warren Street, although the person’s condition is unknown.

Who needs tact, diplomacy or common sense when you’re an American politician ?

I just can’t believe that someone in political office can say something like this and believe that it could actually do anything than turn any civilised people against them, regardless of their religion (or lack of it), should they carry out the threat.

To quote the ABC News report:


In a radio interview last week about Muslims and the war on terror, Mr Tancredo said US bombs could “take out their holy sites”.
When asked if he was “talking about bombing Mecca,” Mr Tancredo reportedly replied, “Yeah.”

I don’t really know what to say about that, it demonstrates an appalling lack of understanding of what’s actually going on, and how what he said could be used against the people he purports to represent (not to mention their allies).

When Evolution Bites Back

New Scientist had a really interesting article about how humans are driving natural selection in a number of areas, and how mechanisms that were put in place to help the survival of species is actually having the opposite effect due to the action of evolution .

The example that caught my eye is the one of only catching fish larger than a certain size, the idea being that by only taking the more mature adult fish you are leaving more fish to reproduce and to keep the population sustainable.

The problem comes when you think of what that means from an evolutionary point of view.

In that scenario it is an evolutionary advantage to be a fish that stays smaller than the allowed catch size, and conversely a disadvantage to grow big. Now both data from fisheries and experimental data has shown that this policy does indeed result in the sizes of fish decreasing over time. In one lab experiment on Menidia Menidia (the Atlantic Silverside) they found that it rapidly evolved into a size that was outside of the catch regime. So when they took large fish they evolved into a smaller size and when they took small fish they evolved into ones that grew bigger.

One solution that’s been posited is catching only medium size fish, the hope being that this will result in selection of fish that grow rapidly from small to large. Of course, if you catch too many then you could end up with a situation like on the Grand Banks where the cod fishery collapsed through overfishing, and even after 13 years of no cod being taken at all they have not bounced back (the suspicion being that this has tipped the balance against code in that ecosystem now).

Of course, designing a net that will only catch fish between certain sizes will be a headache, but then humans have gotten ourselves into this mess in the first place..

Archaeology and the Creative Commons

My wife bought me a subscription to Current World Archaeology, including the last years worth of magazines which I’m rapidly working my way through. Anyway, issue 8 had an excellent article about Çatalhöyük, possibly the oldest known city in the world and included a link to the Çatalhöyük excavations website and I noticed down the bottom that they’re using a Attribution, NonCommercial, ShareAlike Creative Commons license for almost all their material.

That, along with a link on their front page to an Open Source VisualizationToolkit gave me a nice warm fuzzy feeling about how they are going about their science and I felt they deserved a plug and some kudos for it.